Tuesday, December 5






Dialogue session

The dialogue session which was held on 3 Dec 2006 went on very smoothly. There were no heated arguments and not many issues were raised. My only regrets was that the turnouts were poor. Most of the owners' concerns were whether they have to pay for the system or whether it would give the management an excuse to raise the maintenance fees or not. I assured them that there would not be an increase in the maintenance fees because the implementation of the system would not affect the operating expenditure at all. The fund used to finance the whole project comes from the sinking fund and the estimated cost incurred is about RM 300,000. Our reserve stands at about RM 1 000 000. which has not been utilized to date. I told the owners that it is not a prestigious thing to have this access card but we proposed it because it is necessary for our condos. This system can assist the guards to provide better security for Prima. We only need to share the feelings of those victims of break-ins to understand that nothing is more precious than our safety.

It's all system go now. We had met the target of more than 60%. More than 60% of the owners have given their consents. I will be handling over the lists of the signatures to Dats Management Sdn Bhd soon. For me, it is a big relief. The R.A.'s duty is over for now. The final decision still lies with the management. It is an irony that the money is ours but they make the decision.

Goodnight and have a nice day!

3 Comments:

At 12 December, 2006 15:14 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear prima setapak residents,
It is great that we have achieved the 60% consent from owners. Well done.

However, after this stage, maybe many of us will ask the followings:

i) Is the RM300k the cheapest or the best in market. If i am not wrong, to install the door panel at each entrance should cost less than RM60k?
p/s: are residents giving a chance to get cheaper contractor or developer decided all?

ii) How transparent will it be when come to costing?

iii) Maybe the year 2005 financial statement of PS should be released ASAP, if condition allow us to do so.

Sorry for being too legnthy and impolite.

Thank you.

 
At 15 December, 2006 00:39 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I didn't turnout for the dialogue session simply because weekend is the day for me to bring myfamily "jalan-jalan".I would like to suggest the next meeting be held starting 8pm ,anyday between mon to thursday where most of the owners are at home during this hour.We shall see the improvement in turning out for the coming meeting, I suess.

 
At 19 December, 2006 10:35 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Management should have at least 3 quotations to compare the cost. My worry is that when you source from the UOA contractor, does not necessary mean its the cheapest. You know, kickback is very rampant. I hope the RA should try to source from another supplier to compare the cost since the RA would have the instalation specifications by now. RM300K is a lot of money!! I was made to understand that the cost is only about RM140K. Why the sudden increase to RM300K?? Can the RA put up in the notice boards the specification for everyone to see? There should be some form of transoarcy here.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home